NewGet @retentionadam's full report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
10.7K
impressions
2.92M
likes
18.2K
comments
2.75K
posts
298
engagement
0.716%
emv
$66.5K
Average per post
9.81K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

$10M ARR is the FU MONEY of SaaS. At $10M ARR bootstrapped, you and your co-founder clear $1M+/year in salary and dividends easily. You can sell instantly for $30-40M. There are hundreds of EBITDA buyers at this level vs. a handful at $1B valuations. From here, you can do whatever you want. Hire a CEO and work 1 hour/week. Grind 100 hours if that's your thing. Raise $50M from a position of strength. Scale to $25M ARR with 25 people and pay yourself $10-15M/year. Most companies never get here because VCs show up early with decacorn dreams and money you don't need. That capital interferes with the one thing that makes you great: product-market fit. Bootstrapping to $10M ARR is easier and less risky than creating a VC-backed unicorn, with a far higher probability-weighted outcome. If you can find PMF and use customer money to get to $10M, you can do anything you want with your life.

571K
2.22K
127
146
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
$10M ARR is the FU MONEY of SaaS. At $10M ARR bootstrapped, you and your co-founder clear $1M+/year in salary and dividends easily. You can sell instantly for $30-40M. There are hundreds of EBITDA buyers at this level vs. a handful at $1B valuations. From here, you can do whatever you want. Hire a CEO and work 1 hour/week. Grind 100 hours if that's your thing. Raise $50M from a position of strength. Scale to $25M ARR with 25 people and pay yourself $10-15M/year. Most companies never get here because VCs show up early with decacorn dreams and money you don't need. That capital interferes with the one thing that makes you great: product-market fit. Bootstrapping to $10M ARR is easier and less risky than creating a VC-backed unicorn, with a far higher probability-weighted outcome. If you can find PMF and use customer money to get to $10M, you can do anything you want with your life.

x.com/i/article/201444973…

295K
1.27K
10
118
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
http://x.com/i/article/2014449738700226560
I found a letter I wrote to myself in May 2016. 9 years later, it breaks my heart to read it.

I wrote down exactly what I wanted: $25M ARR, lean team, freedom, and the lie I couldn’t afford while stuck at $2.5M.

August 2025 is when I hit it. Everything came true.

But it took 4 years of hopelessness after writing that letter for something to finally work. 

Not in 2017 after the first failed swing. 
Not in 2018 after the second. 
Not even in early 2019. 

November 2019 is when I started GetEmails(.)com, now known as Retention(.)com. That was the thing that finally worked.

The version of me who lived through those years had no idea he’d make it. 

If you're stuck right now, you might be on day 450 with no idea if you have 1 year left or 6. 

That uncertainty makes it 10x harder. 

But the guy who wrote that letter in 2016 had no idea November 2019 was coming. 

He just kept going.
282K
505
44
31
10mo ago
RetentionAdam
I found a letter I wrote to myself in May 2016. 9 years later, it breaks my heart to read it. I wrote down exactly what I wanted: $25M ARR, lean team, freedom, and the lie I couldn’t afford while stuck at $2.5M. August 2025 is when I hit it. Everything came true. But it took 4 years of hopelessness after writing that letter for something to finally work. Not in 2017 after the first failed swing. Not in 2018 after the second. Not even in early 2019. November 2019 is when I started GetEmails(.)com, now known as Retention(.)com. That was the thing that finally worked. The version of me who lived through those years had no idea he’d make it. If you're stuck right now, you might be on day 450 with no idea if you have 1 year left or 6. That uncertainty makes it 10x harder. But the guy who wrote that letter in 2016 had no idea November 2019 was coming. He just kept going.

Me in 2019: > Drinking 2-4 beers/drinks every night > Getting hammered once a week with friends > Drinking was 100% of my stress relief AND social life > Weighed 225 (20lbs heavier than now) > Looked like I was 45, when I was 39 > Business stuck at $3M ARR for the third year in a row Me in 2026: > Zero booze or drugs of any kind in 5.5 years > Stress relief is sauna, cold plunge, and wakesurfing > Social life is hanging out with people who have kids > Weigh 205 (20lbs lighter) > Look like I did when I was 34 (and I'm 44) > Personally making 10x > Happily married, two young kids, settled in Aspen Every founder I know drinks. It's just what you do. Drinks at business dinners, celebrations…nobody questions it. I'd been drinking so much for so long that when I stopped, it felt like I had a superpower. For anybody who drinks every day: if you take 3 months off, you will notice an ENORMOUS difference in the quality of your life. You'll feel like you got 25% of your life back. You'll be more present in all of your relationships. You'll be far more intentional in everything you do. You'll be much better at home and at work. I only wish I did it sooner.

127K
108
5
8
6mo ago
RetentionAdam
Me in 2019: > Drinking 2-4 beers/drinks every night > Getting hammered once a week with friends > Drinking was 100% of my stress relief AND social life > Weighed 225 (20lbs heavier than now) > Looked like I was 45, when I was 39 > Business stuck at $3M ARR for the third year in a row Me in 2026: > Zero booze or drugs of any kind in 5.5 years > Stress relief is sauna, cold plunge, and wakesurfing > Social life is hanging out with people who have kids > Weigh 205 (20lbs lighter) > Look like I did when I was 34 (and I'm 44) > Personally making 10x > Happily married, two young kids, settled in Aspen Every founder I know drinks. It's just what you do. Drinks at business dinners, celebrations…nobody questions it. I'd been drinking so much for so long that when I stopped, it felt like I had a superpower. For anybody who drinks every day: if you take 3 months off, you will notice an ENORMOUS difference in the quality of your life. You'll feel like you got 25% of your life back. You'll be more present in all of your relationships. You'll be far more intentional in everything you do. You'll be much better at home and at work. I only wish I did it sooner.
A billion-dollar company threatened to sue my 3-week-old startup over a LinkedIn post. 

Naturally, I posted their cease & desist letter. 

In 2023, SaaS was getting brutal (people canceling, contracts shrinking), then they called us. 

Them: “We’re doubling your price. But if you extend your contract 6 months early, we’ll keep it flat.”

Me: “What the f*ck?”

So, I did what any mature business professional would do…

Went on LinkedIn and talked sh*t.

Their response was to whip open their corporate playbook from 1987. Page 4: “Send a cease & desist to make problems go away”.

Buddy, I AM the problem. 

I called my lawyer. “What’s the worst case here?”

Him: “They sue you. Couple hundred grand in legal fees if they want to be annoying about it”.

Me: “But imagine the reaction I could get on LinkedIn”.

RB2B was still early. That visibility was worth more than whatever they could throw at me. 

So I posted everything they told me to stop saying. With the legal letter attached. 

The best marketing strategy is being too stupid to be intimidated. 

The billion-dollar bullies tried to sue the little guy into silence (they picked the wrong guy).
94.9K
121
29
6
9mo ago
RetentionAdam
A billion-dollar company threatened to sue my 3-week-old startup over a LinkedIn post. Naturally, I posted their cease & desist letter. In 2023, SaaS was getting brutal (people canceling, contracts shrinking), then they called us. Them: “We’re doubling your price. But if you extend your contract 6 months early, we’ll keep it flat.” Me: “What the f*ck?” So, I did what any mature business professional would do… Went on LinkedIn and talked sh*t. Their response was to whip open their corporate playbook from 1987. Page 4: “Send a cease & desist to make problems go away”. Buddy, I AM the problem. I called my lawyer. “What’s the worst case here?” Him: “They sue you. Couple hundred grand in legal fees if they want to be annoying about it”. Me: “But imagine the reaction I could get on LinkedIn”. RB2B was still early. That visibility was worth more than whatever they could throw at me. So I posted everything they told me to stop saying. With the legal letter attached. The best marketing strategy is being too stupid to be intimidated. The billion-dollar bullies tried to sue the little guy into silence (they picked the wrong guy).

In 2017, a CEO friend told me I was "wasting my life" on my tiny startup. He had raised $30M in VC. His co-founders' families had put in $2M. They were supposed to be on their way to $1B. He tried to recruit me. Here's what happened: Him: "We'll be worth a billion soon. A small piece of equity here will be worth way more than your big stake in that tiny thing you're building." I told him no. Him: "You're not ambitious enough. It's been 5 years and your startup isn't going anywhere. You're too talented to be thinking so small." Me: "Maybe you're right. But it's MY startup. You work for the VCs. I'd rather stay stuck on my own thing than work on yours." I told him what I wanted: mid-20s ARR SaaS with under 40 people. He thought I was crazy. Eventually, he shut down his VC-backed company after burning through $30M. That same month, I booked my first $1M profit month. This is what I took from that: t Stay in the game. If you're small but profitable, you can outlast almost everyone. Time is your biggest advantage. Most VC-backed companies have 18-36 months of runway. You have forever. The world beats you down when you're small. Everyone told me I was thinking too small. That I should raise money. That I'd never build anything meaningful bootstrapped. They were all wrong. Skills compound. Every year you spend building, you get better at product, sales, hiring, and understanding customers. It’s invisible for years. Then suddenly it's not. Survival is the strategy. Most founders quit at year 3 or 5. Stay alive long enough and your odds skyrocket. You just need one breakthrough. Don't let anyone tell you you're wasting your life. The CEO who said I wasn't ambitious enough? He doesn't say that anymore. You don’t need VC money. You need time and one breakthrough. Keep building.

80.0K
764
55
69
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
In 2017, a CEO friend told me I was "wasting my life" on my tiny startup. He had raised $30M in VC. His co-founders' families had put in $2M. They were supposed to be on their way to $1B. He tried to recruit me. Here's what happened: Him: "We'll be worth a billion soon. A small piece of equity here will be worth way more than your big stake in that tiny thing you're building." I told him no. Him: "You're not ambitious enough. It's been 5 years and your startup isn't going anywhere. You're too talented to be thinking so small." Me: "Maybe you're right. But it's MY startup. You work for the VCs. I'd rather stay stuck on my own thing than work on yours." I told him what I wanted: mid-20s ARR SaaS with under 40 people. He thought I was crazy. Eventually, he shut down his VC-backed company after burning through $30M. That same month, I booked my first $1M profit month. This is what I took from that: t Stay in the game. If you're small but profitable, you can outlast almost everyone. Time is your biggest advantage. Most VC-backed companies have 18-36 months of runway. You have forever. The world beats you down when you're small. Everyone told me I was thinking too small. That I should raise money. That I'd never build anything meaningful bootstrapped. They were all wrong. Skills compound. Every year you spend building, you get better at product, sales, hiring, and understanding customers. It’s invisible for years. Then suddenly it's not. Survival is the strategy. Most founders quit at year 3 or 5. Stay alive long enough and your odds skyrocket. You just need one breakthrough. Don't let anyone tell you you're wasting your life. The CEO who said I wasn't ambitious enough? He doesn't say that anymore. You don’t need VC money. You need time and one breakthrough. Keep building.
I talk to delusional Series A founders every day. So now, I just tell them this.

If your company does under $10M ARR, burns over $200k/mo, and has low Gross Retention…you are not worth $50-100M to anyone.
 
Doesn't matter what your investors or your bankers tell you.
 
Dirk Sahlmer from FE International has done nearly 6 years in SaaS M&A and hundreds of valuation conversations. 

He calls it Schrödinger's valuation, and he's right.

Check it out and start recognizing what game you’re actually playing. 

Don’t waste the next 10 years chasing a fantasy.
76.2K
439
44
26
6mo ago
RetentionAdam
I talk to delusional Series A founders every day. So now, I just tell them this. If your company does under $10M ARR, burns over $200k/mo, and has low Gross Retention…you are not worth $50-100M to anyone. Doesn't matter what your investors or your bankers tell you. Dirk Sahlmer from FE International has done nearly 6 years in SaaS M&A and hundreds of valuation conversations. He calls it Schrödinger's valuation, and he's right. Check it out and start recognizing what game you’re actually playing. Don’t waste the next 10 years chasing a fantasy.

THIS IS AN INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT ACQUISITION FOR FOUNDERS: What's not said in this "we only raised $8M and sold for $105M" is the little-known fact that the reason they only raised $8M was that several years ago, nobody would do a Series A for that biz. Which is why Kennan replaced himself as CEO and moved on to ICON. He was upset about it at the time. That moment he couldn't raise was the single best thing that ever happened to him. Here's why this matters for founders: > Selling a business for $105M when you only raised $8M is LIFE CHANGING. > For the same reason he couldn't get the Series A done, I'm not sure a business like that (sticky but sells to a small TAM of elite Shopify brands at $500/mo) is saleable at $500M+. > Had he been "lucky enough" to get the A done and raised at a $200-250M valuation, the exit hurdle would've been $600-750M. > Recharge likely wouldn't be a buyer there ($2.1B val at absolute peak valuations). Not sure anyone would be because if you're buying Skio at $600-750M, you think it's going to $2B. > Skio (which would be the same, GREAT business) would very likely be stuck in a zombie state, pushing for a valuation it was never meant to reach. Like so many others. Ryan Allis said something on my show that's stuck with me: "If you have to raise money, keep it at 1x your ARR at the time." All because it maximizes your optionality. You can sell a great biz for $100-150M and go do whatever you want. You can keep running it. Or you can keep the equity, hire someone else to run it, and go bigger (like Kennan). If you're a founder, keeping a low 9-fig exit on the table is an incredibly smart move. Kennan did it by accident. You should do it on purpose. You only need to get rich once. Have as many paths to that place as possible. (Oh, and PS: the other reason he was able to sell? They were a growing, profitable business. Why do more people not live life this way?!?!)

71.4K
188
8
6
4mo ago
RetentionAdam
THIS IS AN INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT ACQUISITION FOR FOUNDERS: What's not said in this "we only raised $8M and sold for $105M" is the little-known fact that the reason they only raised $8M was that several years ago, nobody would do a Series A for that biz. Which is why Kennan replaced himself as CEO and moved on to ICON. He was upset about it at the time. That moment he couldn't raise was the single best thing that ever happened to him. Here's why this matters for founders: > Selling a business for $105M when you only raised $8M is LIFE CHANGING. > For the same reason he couldn't get the Series A done, I'm not sure a business like that (sticky but sells to a small TAM of elite Shopify brands at $500/mo) is saleable at $500M+. > Had he been "lucky enough" to get the A done and raised at a $200-250M valuation, the exit hurdle would've been $600-750M. > Recharge likely wouldn't be a buyer there ($2.1B val at absolute peak valuations). Not sure anyone would be because if you're buying Skio at $600-750M, you think it's going to $2B. > Skio (which would be the same, GREAT business) would very likely be stuck in a zombie state, pushing for a valuation it was never meant to reach. Like so many others. Ryan Allis said something on my show that's stuck with me: "If you have to raise money, keep it at 1x your ARR at the time." All because it maximizes your optionality. You can sell a great biz for $100-150M and go do whatever you want. You can keep running it. Or you can keep the equity, hire someone else to run it, and go bigger (like Kennan). If you're a founder, keeping a low 9-fig exit on the table is an incredibly smart move. Kennan did it by accident. You should do it on purpose. You only need to get rich once. Have as many paths to that place as possible. (Oh, and PS: the other reason he was able to sell? They were a growing, profitable business. Why do more people not live life this way?!?!)
I get hundreds of cold emails a month, and I ignore every single one.

But last week, one caught my attention, and I'm still thinking about why.

I opened it because I knew the guy. He's got a reputation in B2B, and he's good at going viral. That alone got the open. Most cold emails die at the subject line. This one survived because of who sent it.

Then the first line: “Adam! Wasn't quite sure…”

That hooked me because it felt like a human being who actually thought about what they were going to say to me.

The part that really got me was he knew I wasn't running Meta ads. He probably checked my ads library and saw it was tiny. That's the kind of research 99% of people sending cold emails skip entirely. 

He did his homework on ME. 

Then the social proof was smart as hell. Emphasized companies “like me” without name-dropping anyone I could poke holes in.

And the CTA had a money-back guarantee. If you're confident enough to offer that, I'm confident enough to take the call.

That's what it took.

One email out of thousands.

The difference between this and everything else in my inbox was that this person gave a sh*t before they hit send. They thought about what I specifically would care about and built the email around that.
60.6K
376
44
23
7mo ago
RetentionAdam
I get hundreds of cold emails a month, and I ignore every single one. But last week, one caught my attention, and I'm still thinking about why. I opened it because I knew the guy. He's got a reputation in B2B, and he's good at going viral. That alone got the open. Most cold emails die at the subject line. This one survived because of who sent it. Then the first line: “Adam! Wasn't quite sure…” That hooked me because it felt like a human being who actually thought about what they were going to say to me. The part that really got me was he knew I wasn't running Meta ads. He probably checked my ads library and saw it was tiny. That's the kind of research 99% of people sending cold emails skip entirely. He did his homework on ME. Then the social proof was smart as hell. Emphasized companies “like me” without name-dropping anyone I could poke holes in. And the CTA had a money-back guarantee. If you're confident enough to offer that, I'm confident enough to take the call. That's what it took. One email out of thousands. The difference between this and everything else in my inbox was that this person gave a sh*t before they hit send. They thought about what I specifically would care about and built the email around that.
FOUNDERS: WHAT KIND OF FUCKING MORON SIGNS UP FOR THIS?!?

VC was already a horrible deal for the Founder. If this is how the game has changed, I am even further emboldened that the bootstrapped path is the best path for MOST people in this game.

Unless what you do is highly capital-intensive, you should avoid this “changed game” like it’s the plague. The VC game was already bad: a 90% chance you'd kiss a decade of your life goodbye and walk away with nothing but an education. This new game is meaningfully worse in terms of probability-weighted financial success for YOU, the Founder.

I post here because I want people to realize that what I do is an option. I didn't know it was possible until I found a podcast episode in 2017 with Ross Andrew Paquette from Maropost, who dropped enough info for me to back into the fact that he had a $30m ARR biz dropping $20m to the bottom line, and he owned all the equity.

I had two epiphanies that day: 1/ that seemed like a better life for the founder than any other SaaS I had heard of, and 2/ it seemed much more attainable than hundreds of millions of ARR. So I became obsessed with Ross, tried to figure out how he did it, copied what made sense for my business, and fast forward 10 years and we're not quite there ($32m ARR, $15m run-rate profit), but we're close, and I'm more optimistic than ever about growing our profitability.

People always ask me what mistake I see young Founders make the most. It’s raising money, and it’s in two different situations.

Situation 1: they're at $1m ARR, growing 2-3% per month, and think money will speed that up. It won’t. ZERO percent chance. The only thing that speeds up a startup at that stage is more disruptive product + more disruptive marketing. Neither has anything to do with money. Yet they raise from people who think or say they are VCs, and enter the world of pain of the treadmill of capital without growth.

Situation 2: getting to $10m ARR quickly and raising, thinking your TAM is bigger than it is. I made this mistake, but thank GOD we were so profitable that I didn’t actually raise, I just grew my team from 13 to 60 in 60 days, burned through the TAM in 9mo, hit a wall at 100mph, and for the second time in my career fired everybody I hired in that delusional frenzy. When you take money at that point, you don’t have that option. You are forced to try to widen the TAM, you build a bunch of shit no one wants, and you enter the world of pain of the treadmill of capital without growth.

I want to be your Ross Paquette. This game isn’t easy. VC or not, you have to create disruptive products with disruptive marketing to win. That’s the only way you’ll grow. So, WHY NOT do it without selling your soul to a game you only have a 10% chance of winning? I PROMISE grinding your profitability higher from $15m 12 years into the game is amazing, and you have a WAY higher chance of getting there than going $0-$100m in 9mo.

Fuck Lovable. Stay small.

And keep building.
49.1K
274
42
20
1mo ago
RetentionAdam
FOUNDERS: WHAT KIND OF FUCKING MORON SIGNS UP FOR THIS?!? VC was already a horrible deal for the Founder. If this is how the game has changed, I am even further emboldened that the bootstrapped path is the best path for MOST people in this game. Unless what you do is highly capital-intensive, you should avoid this “changed game” like it’s the plague. The VC game was already bad: a 90% chance you'd kiss a decade of your life goodbye and walk away with nothing but an education. This new game is meaningfully worse in terms of probability-weighted financial success for YOU, the Founder. I post here because I want people to realize that what I do is an option. I didn't know it was possible until I found a podcast episode in 2017 with Ross Andrew Paquette from Maropost, who dropped enough info for me to back into the fact that he had a $30m ARR biz dropping $20m to the bottom line, and he owned all the equity. I had two epiphanies that day: 1/ that seemed like a better life for the founder than any other SaaS I had heard of, and 2/ it seemed much more attainable than hundreds of millions of ARR. So I became obsessed with Ross, tried to figure out how he did it, copied what made sense for my business, and fast forward 10 years and we're not quite there ($32m ARR, $15m run-rate profit), but we're close, and I'm more optimistic than ever about growing our profitability. People always ask me what mistake I see young Founders make the most. It’s raising money, and it’s in two different situations. Situation 1: they're at $1m ARR, growing 2-3% per month, and think money will speed that up. It won’t. ZERO percent chance. The only thing that speeds up a startup at that stage is more disruptive product + more disruptive marketing. Neither has anything to do with money. Yet they raise from people who think or say they are VCs, and enter the world of pain of the treadmill of capital without growth. Situation 2: getting to $10m ARR quickly and raising, thinking your TAM is bigger than it is. I made this mistake, but thank GOD we were so profitable that I didn’t actually raise, I just grew my team from 13 to 60 in 60 days, burned through the TAM in 9mo, hit a wall at 100mph, and for the second time in my career fired everybody I hired in that delusional frenzy. When you take money at that point, you don’t have that option. You are forced to try to widen the TAM, you build a bunch of shit no one wants, and you enter the world of pain of the treadmill of capital without growth. I want to be your Ross Paquette. This game isn’t easy. VC or not, you have to create disruptive products with disruptive marketing to win. That’s the only way you’ll grow. So, WHY NOT do it without selling your soul to a game you only have a 10% chance of winning? I PROMISE grinding your profitability higher from $15m 12 years into the game is amazing, and you have a WAY higher chance of getting there than going $0-$100m in 9mo. Fuck Lovable. Stay small. And keep building.

Until you have PMF, there are only 4 things you should be doing: > talking to customers > improving the product > creating content > finding more customers to talk to That's it.

47.9K
1.16K
77
71
6mo ago
RetentionAdam
Until you have PMF, there are only 4 things you should be doing: > talking to customers > improving the product > creating content > finding more customers to talk to That's it.
A CEO friend raised $40M at a $400M valuation.

Two years later, ARR is flat.

The biggest mistake was how he scaled his sales team.

Another founder buddy just did a PE round. His investors were pushing him to grow from 5 to 20 reps.

This is what they told me (and what I learned talking to 30 other founders):
45.8K
306
26
29
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
A CEO friend raised $40M at a $400M valuation. Two years later, ARR is flat. The biggest mistake was how he scaled his sales team. Another founder buddy just did a PE round. His investors were pushing him to grow from 5 to 20 reps. This is what they told me (and what I learned talking to 30 other founders):

YC’s best advice is “default alive” - have enough cash to survive without the next raise. Great advice… nobody f*cking does it. Paul Graham (the founder of YC) once said he’d raise $500K, get ramen profitable, and probably never raise again. The guy who’s seen more VC deployed than ANY human alive basically says he wouldn’t use it more than he absolutely has to. But the reason no one listens to this advice is because founders are delusional about their own companies. We think what we have is better than what it actually is, and we can’t help ourselves. Our startups are our babies. We have a totally unrealistic and out-of-touch view of them. It’s way too easy when you have a little bit of traction to go out there and raise way too much money. Then you’re set on a path to burn forever. “Default alive” is a great concept. Maybe 1/100 YC companies actually do this. YC knows it, and they fund them anyway.

39.5K
256
39
11
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
YC’s best advice is “default alive” - have enough cash to survive without the next raise. Great advice… nobody f*cking does it. Paul Graham (the founder of YC) once said he’d raise $500K, get ramen profitable, and probably never raise again. The guy who’s seen more VC deployed than ANY human alive basically says he wouldn’t use it more than he absolutely has to. But the reason no one listens to this advice is because founders are delusional about their own companies. We think what we have is better than what it actually is, and we can’t help ourselves. Our startups are our babies. We have a totally unrealistic and out-of-touch view of them. It’s way too easy when you have a little bit of traction to go out there and raise way too much money. Then you’re set on a path to burn forever. “Default alive” is a great concept. Maybe 1/100 YC companies actually do this. YC knows it, and they fund them anyway.

Every founder should be creating content and that’s a hill I’ll die on. Your content is a landing page for literally everyone. - Investors - Agencies - Partners - People you want to hire They are all going to your profile to figure out what you’re about before they do any kind of business with you. I built RB2B to $6.6M ARR in 18mo almost entirely from posting on LinkedIn. I hear it over and over. Founders start posting, and 6 months later, they all say the same sh*t. “Doors opened that I didn’t know existed.” TLDR: Create more content.

37.6K
191
16
9
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
Every founder should be creating content and that’s a hill I’ll die on. Your content is a landing page for literally everyone. - Investors - Agencies - Partners - People you want to hire They are all going to your profile to figure out what you’re about before they do any kind of business with you. I built RB2B to $6.6M ARR in 18mo almost entirely from posting on LinkedIn. I hear it over and over. Founders start posting, and 6 months later, they all say the same sh*t. “Doors opened that I didn’t know existed.” TLDR: Create more content.

COLD EMAIL IS DEAD. People doing outbound right now are only sending more emails to fix the exact problems that sending more emails caused. We went the other direction. Our campaign is dead simple: Someone lands on RB2B(.)com We identify them And we send an email. “Hey, saw you on our site. Do you have any questions?” That campaign converts at over 10%. One signup for every 10 emails sent. For context, standard cold email right now converts at about 1 in 500. And getting worse. Stop emailing strangers and focus on those people who already know you exist. Tools like Clay, Smartlead, and Instantly made high-volume personalized outbound so easy that everyone started doing it at the same time. What used to be a competitive advantage became noise. Spam filters got smarter. More volume going out, harder filters coming in. The only response most people have is to send even more email, which makes the problem worse for everyone. What converts 10 to 30 times better is inbound-led outbound. Drive people to your site first, identify who they are, then reach out while they're still warm. RB2B makes the middle step possible. The moment someone lands on your website, you get their… > Full name > Job title > Company > LinkedIn profile > Every page they visited …pushed to Slack or your CRM instantly. If someone was just on your pricing page, that's high intent. If they looked at three case studies, they're doing research. You know exactly who to prioritize and exactly what to say. From there, use Clay to enrich the data and filter by ICP, then push to Instantly or Smartlead for sending. The email goes out while they're still warm. AND KEEP YOUR COPY SIMPLE. Our prospecting email has some light AI personalization about who the customer is actually targeting, but the core message is completely plain. “We have a product that identifies anonymous website visitors and sends their LinkedIn profiles to your Slack in real time. It's free. Reply yes if you're interested, reply no if you're not.” Yes gets a signup link. No gets an unsubscribe. That's the whole system.

29.0K
119
38
3
6mo ago
RetentionAdam
COLD EMAIL IS DEAD. People doing outbound right now are only sending more emails to fix the exact problems that sending more emails caused. We went the other direction. Our campaign is dead simple: Someone lands on RB2B(.)com We identify them And we send an email. “Hey, saw you on our site. Do you have any questions?” That campaign converts at over 10%. One signup for every 10 emails sent. For context, standard cold email right now converts at about 1 in 500. And getting worse. Stop emailing strangers and focus on those people who already know you exist. Tools like Clay, Smartlead, and Instantly made high-volume personalized outbound so easy that everyone started doing it at the same time. What used to be a competitive advantage became noise. Spam filters got smarter. More volume going out, harder filters coming in. The only response most people have is to send even more email, which makes the problem worse for everyone. What converts 10 to 30 times better is inbound-led outbound. Drive people to your site first, identify who they are, then reach out while they're still warm. RB2B makes the middle step possible. The moment someone lands on your website, you get their… > Full name > Job title > Company > LinkedIn profile > Every page they visited …pushed to Slack or your CRM instantly. If someone was just on your pricing page, that's high intent. If they looked at three case studies, they're doing research. You know exactly who to prioritize and exactly what to say. From there, use Clay to enrich the data and filter by ICP, then push to Instantly or Smartlead for sending. The email goes out while they're still warm. AND KEEP YOUR COPY SIMPLE. Our prospecting email has some light AI personalization about who the customer is actually targeting, but the core message is completely plain. “We have a product that identifies anonymous website visitors and sends their LinkedIn profiles to your Slack in real time. It's free. Reply yes if you're interested, reply no if you're not.” Yes gets a signup link. No gets an unsubscribe. That's the whole system.

Every time I feel bad about my business - which is often - I get dinner with a VC backed Founder in the $20-30m ARR range who has raised over $50m. I share my complaints, then they share theirs👇 - They are unprofitable - They’re either stuck or not growing fast enough for their investors - Their investors send them all the Clay and AI financing news weekly - They have 5x the team size I do (and execs) - They are on planes at least 1x/week (I hardly travel) - They are being forced to add product complexity - They face intense new-entrant competition despite superior product - They are under an incredible amount of stress and don’t see a way out After they are done… it always kicks off the same dialogue: CEO: “But you’re making money, right?” Me: “Yea, we will probably do $12-14m profit this year." CEO: “That sounds like the absolute dream.” To which I always get reminded that... Yes, it actually is! But when you’re in the middle of it all, it’s so easy to lose sight of. Startups are hard. Some things get easier, but in my 12 years of experience, it almost always feels like shit. But if you can last long enough as a bootstrapper: 1. You will end up being enormously profitable (mini exits every year) 2. You will have total freedom to design the life you want for yourself Raising money is exciting and validating, but most of the time you end up stuck with no way out. The reality? $10m ARR is the FU Money of SaaS. In 2026, it takes fewer FTE’s than ever before. At RB2B we’re about to cross $9.6m ARR growing with a team of 3. 99% of VC backed founders would kill for that business. If you can bootstrap, bootstrap.

26.7K
231
50
10
3w ago
RetentionAdam
Every time I feel bad about my business - which is often - I get dinner with a VC backed Founder in the $20-30m ARR range who has raised over $50m. I share my complaints, then they share theirs👇 - They are unprofitable - They’re either stuck or not growing fast enough for their investors - Their investors send them all the Clay and AI financing news weekly - They have 5x the team size I do (and execs) - They are on planes at least 1x/week (I hardly travel) - They are being forced to add product complexity - They face intense new-entrant competition despite superior product - They are under an incredible amount of stress and don’t see a way out After they are done… it always kicks off the same dialogue: CEO: “But you’re making money, right?” Me: “Yea, we will probably do $12-14m profit this year." CEO: “That sounds like the absolute dream.” To which I always get reminded that... Yes, it actually is! But when you’re in the middle of it all, it’s so easy to lose sight of. Startups are hard. Some things get easier, but in my 12 years of experience, it almost always feels like shit. But if you can last long enough as a bootstrapper: 1. You will end up being enormously profitable (mini exits every year) 2. You will have total freedom to design the life you want for yourself Raising money is exciting and validating, but most of the time you end up stuck with no way out. The reality? $10m ARR is the FU Money of SaaS. In 2026, it takes fewer FTE’s than ever before. At RB2B we’re about to cross $9.6m ARR growing with a team of 3. 99% of VC backed founders would kill for that business. If you can bootstrap, bootstrap.

x.com/i/article/201095332…

23.4K
130
8
11
8mo ago
RetentionAdam
http://x.com/i/article/2010953326771269632

x.com/i/article/202455866…

18.6K
59
3
4
7mo ago
RetentionAdam
http://x.com/i/article/2024558668075950080

VCs convincing founders to take money with a 90%+ probability they will fail. They call it a treadmill for a reason. The second you take capital, you're on it, and it's set at a speed that works for them, not necessarily for you. VC IS A SCAM FOR MOST

16.4K
152
20
10
5mo ago
RetentionAdam
VCs convincing founders to take money with a 90%+ probability they will fail. They call it a treadmill for a reason. The second you take capital, you're on it, and it's set at a speed that works for them, not necessarily for you. VC IS A SCAM FOR MOST

Every one of the 3,950 failed YC founders thought they were special. So do you.

15.3K
111
7
5
5mo ago
RetentionAdam
Every one of the 3,950 failed YC founders thought they were special. So do you.

Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) X Stats & Analytics

Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) has 10.7K X followers with a 0.72% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 298 posts, Adam Robinson received 18.2K total likes and 2.92M impressions, averaging 61.0 likes per post. This page tracks Adam Robinson's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily.

Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does Adam Robinson have?+
Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) has 10.7K X (Twitter) followers as of September 2026.
What is Adam Robinson's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
Adam Robinson's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 0.72% over the last 12 months, based on 298 posts.
How many likes does Adam Robinson get on X (Twitter)?+
Adam Robinson received 18.2K total likes across 298 posts in the last 12 months, averaging 61.0 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does Adam Robinson get?+
Adam Robinson's X (Twitter) content generated 2.92M total impressions over the last 12 months.