NewGet @retentionadam's full report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
20.2K
impressions
20.4M
likes
39.5K
comments
5.09K
posts
369
engagement
0.219%
emv
$424K
Average per post
55.3K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

You don't need to crash a plane to learn to fly ... and you don't need VC to build a business.

8.05M
8.40K
1.22K
2.38K
6mo ago
RetentionAdam
You don't need to crash a plane to learn to fly ... and you don't need VC to build a business.

$10M ARR is the FU MONEY of SaaS. At $10M ARR bootstrapped, you and your co-founder clear $1M+/year in salary and dividends easily. You can sell instantly for $30-40M. There are hundreds of EBITDA buyers at this level vs. a handful at $1B valuations. From here, you can do whatever you want. Hire a CEO and work 1 hour/week. Grind 100 hours if that's your thing. Raise $50M from a position of strength. Scale to $25M ARR with 25 people and pay yourself $10-15M/year. Most companies never get here because VCs show up early with decacorn dreams and money you don't need. That capital interferes with the one thing that makes you great: product-market fit. Bootstrapping to $10M ARR is easier and less risky than creating a VC-backed unicorn, with a far higher probability-weighted outcome. If you can find PMF and use customer money to get to $10M, you can do anything you want with your life.

1.70M
4.57K
208
328
10mo ago
RetentionAdam
$10M ARR is the FU MONEY of SaaS. At $10M ARR bootstrapped, you and your co-founder clear $1M+/year in salary and dividends easily. You can sell instantly for $30-40M. There are hundreds of EBITDA buyers at this level vs. a handful at $1B valuations. From here, you can do whatever you want. Hire a CEO and work 1 hour/week. Grind 100 hours if that's your thing. Raise $50M from a position of strength. Scale to $25M ARR with 25 people and pay yourself $10-15M/year. Most companies never get here because VCs show up early with decacorn dreams and money you don't need. That capital interferes with the one thing that makes you great: product-market fit. Bootstrapping to $10M ARR is easier and less risky than creating a VC-backed unicorn, with a far higher probability-weighted outcome. If you can find PMF and use customer money to get to $10M, you can do anything you want with your life.

In my 20’s, I used to work on Wall Street. People my age now (45) said they were working 70, 80, 90 hours a week for their families…but all their families actually wanted was their presence. They didn’t understand why their families resented how much they worked when they lived in a nice house, and their kids went to private schools. It was just the world we all lived in. We knew nothing else. I decided early in my startup journey that wasn’t going to be me. My co-founders and I have always had a policy of quitting at 5 or 5:30. By that, I mean: > Shut off my laptop > No more work talk > Go home to my family Frequently I’m out even earlier - 3-5, depending on whether I want to do something with the kids. I rarely travel for work and don’t entertain for work. My family life gives me energy for my work. My work gives me energy for my family life. I'm trying to stay not burnt out and excited about this for several decades. Can every founder choose this? Maybe not everybody, but more people have the choice than realize they do. There is great reward that comes from designing a business around the life you want.

1.28M
5.99K
273
621
6mo ago
RetentionAdam
In my 20’s, I used to work on Wall Street. People my age now (45) said they were working 70, 80, 90 hours a week for their families…but all their families actually wanted was their presence. They didn’t understand why their families resented how much they worked when they lived in a nice house, and their kids went to private schools. It was just the world we all lived in. We knew nothing else. I decided early in my startup journey that wasn’t going to be me. My co-founders and I have always had a policy of quitting at 5 or 5:30. By that, I mean: > Shut off my laptop > No more work talk > Go home to my family Frequently I’m out even earlier - 3-5, depending on whether I want to do something with the kids. I rarely travel for work and don’t entertain for work. My family life gives me energy for my work. My work gives me energy for my family life. I'm trying to stay not burnt out and excited about this for several decades. Can every founder choose this? Maybe not everybody, but more people have the choice than realize they do. There is great reward that comes from designing a business around the life you want.
Bending Spoons could run http://apollo.io/ with 20 people, for $100m+ profit per year. 

Yet Apollo has 800 employees and is likely break-even at best. WHY!??! 

Because Apollo - like so many other SaaS companies - is stuck in the “Zombie Trap”.

What’s the Zombie Trap?

- A company raised $ XXX million during COVID/ZIRP
- The last round was a unicorn valuation at over 10x rev
- Growth slowed, whacked people, got to breakeven
- Valuations collapsed - ZoomInfo w/ 10x their rev now has lower market cap than Apollo’s last round

SO WHAT THE HELL IS APOLLO SUPPOSED TO DO???

Tim Zheng was so confused by what to do that he stepped down as CEO.

I don’t blame him.

The pickle Apollo is in is that they literally CAN’T do what they SHOULD do … Which is what Bending Spoons WILL do when they buy this company (and many others like them).

BENDING SPOONS PLAYBOOK FOR APOLLO:

1/ Reduce staff from 800 to 20 (yet ship features customers actually want FASTER)
2/ Go entirely PLG, focus on contact data, stop trying to be Clay
3/ Increase pricing sophistication to offset ENT rev collapse
4/ Crank 100+m profit/yr out of a great brand that’s lost its way

Once Bending Spoon CEO Luca Ferrari gets on a podcast and explains that he can actually run companies this way, it becomes obvious to the listener that the company should have done this on their own.

But they can’t.

Why?

BECAUSE VC’S WON’T LET THEM.

Founders sign up for a system where making $100m of profit per year is so far out of the range of acceptable outcomes that it’s not even a consideration.

Instead, Apollo, and other Zombies like them:

- Hire new leadership, many from companies than have actually been Spoon’d

- Myopically focus on the one company in their space with increasing valuation (in this case, Clay)

- Ferociously build to try to create a copycat value proposition (which dilutes their brand and confuses the shit out of customers and prospects)

- Aggressively market their “platform”, publicly making claims that they are not what 99.9% of their customers think they are (in this case, a contact data company)

- Pray that they will be as lucky as the few and far between who Salesforce acquires (like Qualified or Braze etc etc)

Meanwhile, I’m licking my chops.

Apollo is the undisputed leader in contact data for the segment we’re going after with http://moltsets.com/, and they have completely forgotten they sell contact data. Just look at their site.

It’s giving me the opportunity to hit THEIR market with a value prop VERY SIMILAR to the value prop that got them where they are today. 

Which doesn’t resemble what they’re currently selling. 

DATA IN '22: 
ZoomInfo - $20k
Apollo - $99/m unlimited per seat

DATA IN '27:
ZoomInfo - $20k
Apollo - $99/m for 4000 credits per seat (shrinking by the month)
MoltSets - $27/m unlimited, unlimited seats

(Try MoltSets here for free: https://moltsets.com/)

YOU: Ok Adam, you have cheap data. I’m sure it’s shit!

ME: We’ve been rapidly improving our dataset as we hear customer feedback. 

The biggest complaint were “stale profiles”, or verified/deliverable emails that were the last role...

That problem will be mostly solved 11/1, and by Jan 1 we will be refreshing profiles every 3days. 

The insane thing?

Starting Dec 1, we’re going to re-validate all email addresses of 150m global contacts EVERY 7 DAYS.

MoltSets will be the highest quality B2B contact database in the world.

At $27/mo unlimited. 

Where does that leave Apollo? 

You tell me.
1.09M
1.08K
465
366
6d ago
RetentionAdam
Bending Spoons could run http://apollo.io/ with 20 people, for $100m+ profit per year. Yet Apollo has 800 employees and is likely break-even at best. WHY!??! Because Apollo - like so many other SaaS companies - is stuck in the “Zombie Trap”. What’s the Zombie Trap? - A company raised $ XXX million during COVID/ZIRP - The last round was a unicorn valuation at over 10x rev - Growth slowed, whacked people, got to breakeven - Valuations collapsed - ZoomInfo w/ 10x their rev now has lower market cap than Apollo’s last round SO WHAT THE HELL IS APOLLO SUPPOSED TO DO??? Tim Zheng was so confused by what to do that he stepped down as CEO. I don’t blame him. The pickle Apollo is in is that they literally CAN’T do what they SHOULD do … Which is what Bending Spoons WILL do when they buy this company (and many others like them). BENDING SPOONS PLAYBOOK FOR APOLLO: 1/ Reduce staff from 800 to 20 (yet ship features customers actually want FASTER) 2/ Go entirely PLG, focus on contact data, stop trying to be Clay 3/ Increase pricing sophistication to offset ENT rev collapse 4/ Crank 100+m profit/yr out of a great brand that’s lost its way Once Bending Spoon CEO Luca Ferrari gets on a podcast and explains that he can actually run companies this way, it becomes obvious to the listener that the company should have done this on their own. But they can’t. Why? BECAUSE VC’S WON’T LET THEM. Founders sign up for a system where making $100m of profit per year is so far out of the range of acceptable outcomes that it’s not even a consideration. Instead, Apollo, and other Zombies like them: - Hire new leadership, many from companies than have actually been Spoon’d - Myopically focus on the one company in their space with increasing valuation (in this case, Clay) - Ferociously build to try to create a copycat value proposition (which dilutes their brand and confuses the shit out of customers and prospects) - Aggressively market their “platform”, publicly making claims that they are not what 99.9% of their customers think they are (in this case, a contact data company) - Pray that they will be as lucky as the few and far between who Salesforce acquires (like Qualified or Braze etc etc) Meanwhile, I’m licking my chops. Apollo is the undisputed leader in contact data for the segment we’re going after with http://moltsets.com/, and they have completely forgotten they sell contact data. Just look at their site. It’s giving me the opportunity to hit THEIR market with a value prop VERY SIMILAR to the value prop that got them where they are today. Which doesn’t resemble what they’re currently selling. DATA IN '22: ZoomInfo - $20k Apollo - $99/m unlimited per seat DATA IN '27: ZoomInfo - $20k Apollo - $99/m for 4000 credits per seat (shrinking by the month) MoltSets - $27/m unlimited, unlimited seats (Try MoltSets here for free: https://moltsets.com/) YOU: Ok Adam, you have cheap data. I’m sure it’s shit! ME: We’ve been rapidly improving our dataset as we hear customer feedback. The biggest complaint were “stale profiles”, or verified/deliverable emails that were the last role... That problem will be mostly solved 11/1, and by Jan 1 we will be refreshing profiles every 3days. The insane thing? Starting Dec 1, we’re going to re-validate all email addresses of 150m global contacts EVERY 7 DAYS. MoltSets will be the highest quality B2B contact database in the world. At $27/mo unlimited. Where does that leave Apollo? You tell me.

2019: I want a $25m ARR biz w/ >35 FTE. retention.com/ today: $23m ARR, 27 FTE. 2024: $10m ARR w/ 3 FTEs is the dream. rb2b.com/ Today: $9.5m ARR, 3 FTE’s Today: I want a $1B ARR 1 man startup. moltsets.com/ in 2028: …to be continued...

860K
747
37
24
2mo ago
RetentionAdam
2019: I want a $25m ARR biz w/ >35 FTE. https://retention.com/ today: $23m ARR, 27 FTE. 2024: $10m ARR w/ 3 FTEs is the dream. https://rb2b.com/ Today: $9.5m ARR, 3 FTE’s Today: I want a $1B ARR 1 man startup. https://moltsets.com/ in 2028: …to be continued...
Bootstrapped founders while OpenAI and Anthropic make it impossible to sell or take secondary.
603K
313
22
31
1w ago
RetentionAdam
Bootstrapped founders while OpenAI and Anthropic make it impossible to sell or take secondary.
Using Clay, Wispr Flow and Claude Code, Alex Fine (CEO of Understory) just built 8 multi-channel campaigns to run 1 allbound system across outbound email, LinkedIn, LinkedIn ads, and Meta ads. 

It's insane! 

It landed 2 new opps in the last 30 minutes. 

Here's how it works: 👇

First off, he didn't even log into Clay to build this. He did everything from the terminal in Claude Code using the Clay CLI, MoltSets and Deepline. 

The Clay CLI is crazy good. He said the tricky part is building skills that can navigate it and operate it efficiently, but once you do that you can literally do just about everything (we'll show you how. see below). 

The other part that blew him away is the ability to find the exact audience he was looking for with precision using MoltSets as a first source. (!!)

Once he was able to articulate the perfect company, he was able to spin up allbound audiences based on anything. Lookalikes from their most successful clients, etc.

So he ran a test...

He wanted to see if he could build an entire allbound motion using nothing but his voice.

Highly tailored segments, messaging, persona matching, case studies, etc. 

The results are CRAZY.

We're going over them and HOW TO BUILD THESE EXACT CAMPAIGNS tomorrow LIVE.

Join us get to copy Alex’s exact Claude skill files and terminal setup.

We're covering:

- Voice-to-Terminal Execution: Triggering multi-channel campaigns using Wispr Flow

- The Clay CLI Playbook: Navigating and executing Clay workflows directly from CC

- Terminal Data Sourcing: Pulling verified audiences and lookalikes natively using MoltSets

- Multi-Channel Audience: Syncing targets across outbound email, Meta, and LinkedIn ads

- Build Reply Agents: Deploying Clay workflows that auto-generate tailored case studies the second a prospect replies to an email CTA.

Starts at 11am ET.

Join us here: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0ngothOlTTyHnwFvdENCRw#/registration
461K
162
17
10
1w ago
RetentionAdam
Using Clay, Wispr Flow and Claude Code, Alex Fine (CEO of Understory) just built 8 multi-channel campaigns to run 1 allbound system across outbound email, LinkedIn, LinkedIn ads, and Meta ads. It's insane! It landed 2 new opps in the last 30 minutes. Here's how it works: 👇 First off, he didn't even log into Clay to build this. He did everything from the terminal in Claude Code using the Clay CLI, MoltSets and Deepline. The Clay CLI is crazy good. He said the tricky part is building skills that can navigate it and operate it efficiently, but once you do that you can literally do just about everything (we'll show you how. see below). The other part that blew him away is the ability to find the exact audience he was looking for with precision using MoltSets as a first source. (!!) Once he was able to articulate the perfect company, he was able to spin up allbound audiences based on anything. Lookalikes from their most successful clients, etc. So he ran a test... He wanted to see if he could build an entire allbound motion using nothing but his voice. Highly tailored segments, messaging, persona matching, case studies, etc. The results are CRAZY. We're going over them and HOW TO BUILD THESE EXACT CAMPAIGNS tomorrow LIVE. Join us get to copy Alex’s exact Claude skill files and terminal setup. We're covering: - Voice-to-Terminal Execution: Triggering multi-channel campaigns using Wispr Flow - The Clay CLI Playbook: Navigating and executing Clay workflows directly from CC - Terminal Data Sourcing: Pulling verified audiences and lookalikes natively using MoltSets - Multi-Channel Audience: Syncing targets across outbound email, Meta, and LinkedIn ads - Build Reply Agents: Deploying Clay workflows that auto-generate tailored case studies the second a prospect replies to an email CTA. Starts at 11am ET. Join us here: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0ngothOlTTyHnwFvdENCRw#/registration
Over the past 12 months, I spoke to more than 50 top-tier VC firms about investing in my $25M ARR SaaS company.

After a full year of pitches, term sheets, and big promises...

I walked away from every single one and decided I would NEVER take VC money.

Most people would say this is insane.

But this was one of the best decisions of my founder career.

So I just recorded a video, going over the 7 reasons why I chose to stay bootstrapped, why taking VC money would have been catastrophic for my business and what this means for you.

I show you:

- Why dividends beat lottery tickets (and how I'm banking $1M/month in profit)

- The harsh truth about investor "value-add" (spoiler: it's mostly BS)

- Why a new seat at the table destroys companies

- How investors play a portfolio game while you're all-in on ONE bet

- Why I don't believe in spreadsheets or metrics

Watch the full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk52hBf2LE8&amp
417K
440
20
50
11mo ago
RetentionAdam
Over the past 12 months, I spoke to more than 50 top-tier VC firms about investing in my $25M ARR SaaS company. After a full year of pitches, term sheets, and big promises... I walked away from every single one and decided I would NEVER take VC money. Most people would say this is insane. But this was one of the best decisions of my founder career. So I just recorded a video, going over the 7 reasons why I chose to stay bootstrapped, why taking VC money would have been catastrophic for my business and what this means for you. I show you: - Why dividends beat lottery tickets (and how I'm banking $1M/month in profit) - The harsh truth about investor "value-add" (spoiler: it's mostly BS) - Why a new seat at the table destroys companies - How investors play a portfolio game while you're all-in on ONE bet - Why I don't believe in spreadsheets or metrics Watch the full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk52hBf2LE8&amp

FOUNDERS - WHAT KIND OF FUCKING MORON SIGNS UP FOR THIS???

331K
124
13
10
1w ago
RetentionAdam
FOUNDERS - WHAT KIND OF FUCKING MORON SIGNS UP FOR THIS???

x.com/i/article/201444973…

301K
1.27K
10
119
9mo ago
RetentionAdam
http://x.com/i/article/2014449738700226560
I found a letter I wrote to myself in May 2016. 9 years later, it breaks my heart to read it.

I wrote down exactly what I wanted: $25M ARR, lean team, freedom, and the lie I couldn’t afford while stuck at $2.5M.

August 2025 is when I hit it. Everything came true.

But it took 4 years of hopelessness after writing that letter for something to finally work. 

Not in 2017 after the first failed swing. 
Not in 2018 after the second. 
Not even in early 2019. 

November 2019 is when I started GetEmails(.)com, now known as Retention(.)com. That was the thing that finally worked.

The version of me who lived through those years had no idea he’d make it. 

If you're stuck right now, you might be on day 450 with no idea if you have 1 year left or 6. 

That uncertainty makes it 10x harder. 

But the guy who wrote that letter in 2016 had no idea November 2019 was coming. 

He just kept going.
285K
509
45
32
11mo ago
RetentionAdam
I found a letter I wrote to myself in May 2016. 9 years later, it breaks my heart to read it. I wrote down exactly what I wanted: $25M ARR, lean team, freedom, and the lie I couldn’t afford while stuck at $2.5M. August 2025 is when I hit it. Everything came true. But it took 4 years of hopelessness after writing that letter for something to finally work. Not in 2017 after the first failed swing. Not in 2018 after the second. Not even in early 2019. November 2019 is when I started GetEmails(.)com, now known as Retention(.)com. That was the thing that finally worked. The version of me who lived through those years had no idea he’d make it. If you're stuck right now, you might be on day 450 with no idea if you have 1 year left or 6. That uncertainty makes it 10x harder. But the guy who wrote that letter in 2016 had no idea November 2019 was coming. He just kept going.
“Mom, how did we get so rich?

“Your father raised $100 million for his startup.”

“So he got rich?”

“No. I left him for the VC who made 2 and 20 on all the money he invested”
229K
327
50
75
3w ago
RetentionAdam
“Mom, how did we get so rich? “Your father raised $100 million for his startup.” “So he got rich?” “No. I left him for the VC who made 2 and 20 on all the money he invested”
Amos Bar-Joseph just cut his AI monthly invoice from $130K to $50K while ARR grew 25% MoM, and it made one thing clear... the AI model race to the bottom has begun. 👇

He said once they finish the move to open source, that Anthropic invoice will go to ZERO.

Here's what's happening...

For months their agent ran on Sonnet + Opus, and they treated $100K+ invoices like the cost of doing business.

Then Minimax dropped. Then GLM. They ran the evals expecting a gap.

There wasn't one. Not for the work that matters to their customers... scoring leads, reaching out to prospects, updating their CRM, summarizing calls.

Same output, a fraction of the cost. 

So they rebuilt the entire stack open-source.

That's how $130K became $50K.

The frontier labs are in a race to the bottom.

Token costs are collapsing toward zero. 

Soon everyone will have frontier intelligence for pennies.

So when the model stops being the moat, the harness around it becomes the most valuable asset.. the context, the routing, the taste to know which task goes where. That's the bet Amos made the day they started Swan AI

And it's working! 

Tomorrow Amos is going LIVE with me to show you exactly how they cut their AI bills by 60% and built an agentic harness for GTM (and why it's the most strategic piece in the GTM stack - not the model provider).

Plus, he'll demo how he built the custom GTM tooling their using to grow 25% MoM. Like deal rooms and automated collateral generation with Lovable.

Tomorrow at 11am ET.

Join us here: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0ngothOlTTyHnwFvdENCRw#/registration
219K
67
8
15
2w ago
RetentionAdam
Amos Bar-Joseph just cut his AI monthly invoice from $130K to $50K while ARR grew 25% MoM, and it made one thing clear... the AI model race to the bottom has begun. 👇 He said once they finish the move to open source, that Anthropic invoice will go to ZERO. Here's what's happening... For months their agent ran on Sonnet + Opus, and they treated $100K+ invoices like the cost of doing business. Then Minimax dropped. Then GLM. They ran the evals expecting a gap. There wasn't one. Not for the work that matters to their customers... scoring leads, reaching out to prospects, updating their CRM, summarizing calls. Same output, a fraction of the cost. So they rebuilt the entire stack open-source. That's how $130K became $50K. The frontier labs are in a race to the bottom. Token costs are collapsing toward zero. Soon everyone will have frontier intelligence for pennies. So when the model stops being the moat, the harness around it becomes the most valuable asset.. the context, the routing, the taste to know which task goes where. That's the bet Amos made the day they started Swan AI And it's working! Tomorrow Amos is going LIVE with me to show you exactly how they cut their AI bills by 60% and built an agentic harness for GTM (and why it's the most strategic piece in the GTM stack - not the model provider). Plus, he'll demo how he built the custom GTM tooling their using to grow 25% MoM. Like deal rooms and automated collateral generation with Lovable. Tomorrow at 11am ET. Join us here: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0ngothOlTTyHnwFvdENCRw#/registration
Hey YC Founders - since I can’t turn back time and have you NOT do YC (I wish I could) … If you are rolling your own agentic cold outreach stack, check out MoltSets. 

Thank me later. 

$97/mo unlimited data + unlimited seats, 100% verified data, will revalidate every 3 days.

Try it here: https://moltsets.com/

P.S. 

Tag a YC founder and I’ll send you a MoltSets hoodie.
200K
95
12
14
2w ago
RetentionAdam
Hey YC Founders - since I can’t turn back time and have you NOT do YC (I wish I could) … If you are rolling your own agentic cold outreach stack, check out MoltSets. Thank me later. $97/mo unlimited data + unlimited seats, 100% verified data, will revalidate every 3 days. Try it here: https://moltsets.com/ P.S. Tag a YC founder and I’ll send you a MoltSets hoodie.

Here's my startup hiring philosophy: Hire people that would be great founders, but are too risk-averse to start their own thing. The key is giving them free rein to own their area of the business. Try to control them, and they leave. Freedom leads to great culture.

132K
457
18
44
4w ago
RetentionAdam
Here's my startup hiring philosophy: Hire people that would be great founders, but are too risk-averse to start their own thing. The key is giving them free rein to own their area of the business. Try to control them, and they leave. Freedom leads to great culture.

Me in 2019: > Drinking 2-4 beers/drinks every night > Getting hammered once a week with friends > Drinking was 100% of my stress relief AND social life > Weighed 225 (20lbs heavier than now) > Looked like I was 45, when I was 39 > Business stuck at $3M ARR for the third year in a row Me in 2026: > Zero booze or drugs of any kind in 5.5 years > Stress relief is sauna, cold plunge, and wakesurfing > Social life is hanging out with people who have kids > Weigh 205 (20lbs lighter) > Look like I did when I was 34 (and I'm 44) > Personally making 10x > Happily married, two young kids, settled in Aspen Every founder I know drinks. It's just what you do. Drinks at business dinners, celebrations…nobody questions it. I'd been drinking so much for so long that when I stopped, it felt like I had a superpower. For anybody who drinks every day: if you take 3 months off, you will notice an ENORMOUS difference in the quality of your life. You'll feel like you got 25% of your life back. You'll be more present in all of your relationships. You'll be far more intentional in everything you do. You'll be much better at home and at work. I only wish I did it sooner.

131K
128
5
13
7mo ago
RetentionAdam
Me in 2019: > Drinking 2-4 beers/drinks every night > Getting hammered once a week with friends > Drinking was 100% of my stress relief AND social life > Weighed 225 (20lbs heavier than now) > Looked like I was 45, when I was 39 > Business stuck at $3M ARR for the third year in a row Me in 2026: > Zero booze or drugs of any kind in 5.5 years > Stress relief is sauna, cold plunge, and wakesurfing > Social life is hanging out with people who have kids > Weigh 205 (20lbs lighter) > Look like I did when I was 34 (and I'm 44) > Personally making 10x > Happily married, two young kids, settled in Aspen Every founder I know drinks. It's just what you do. Drinks at business dinners, celebrations…nobody questions it. I'd been drinking so much for so long that when I stopped, it felt like I had a superpower. For anybody who drinks every day: if you take 3 months off, you will notice an ENORMOUS difference in the quality of your life. You'll feel like you got 25% of your life back. You'll be more present in all of your relationships. You'll be far more intentional in everything you do. You'll be much better at home and at work. I only wish I did it sooner.

RB2B is a $10m ARR company with 1 FTE. I'd be OK if it never grew another dollar. Why? Because what makes it work are the constraints. We designed a stupid-simple PLG product that could be supported entirely by @fin_ai. The McDonald’s of site visitor ID. I know most founders don't agree with this approach... I can’t tell you the number of times - since BEFORE LAUNCH - people told us we needed to use AI to filter for ICP, find more contacts, draft messaging, and send emails and LinkedIn messages. And it’s what all of our competitors did (who are now all DEAD). While we kept the core product in its simplest possible form. In fact, it’s STILL HAPPENING. Last week on the way home from our all team offsite in Toronto my buddy @jesseogtm was yelling at me about how I needed to roll MoltSets into RB2B because it would solve our churn problem and double revenue. But here’s my question to founders: WHY DO WE NEED TO SOLVE OUR CHURN PROBLEM AND DOUBLE REVENUE? If you include our OEM $$$, RB2B is over $10m ARR. And it requires ALMOST NOTHING from us, while our core team goes on to build something we think has similar characteristics but is even MORE promising. Yes, we have a shared data team of 5 people who support four business units that total $32m ARR. Yes, Ebru does answer escalated tickets, and continues to improve Fin. Yes, Kayley handles OEM. But I am completely baffled that human nature makes it impossible for ANYBODY - even Jesse, a close homie and fellow bootstrapper - to accept that RB2B might just orbit at $10m ARR for the next 5-10 years, its product in its simplest possible form, supported by a SEARINGLY CLEAR value proposition, at a price so low that nobody can disrupt its market position. I listened to @dhh on @davidsenra's podcast on the way to the offsite. Of course I’m a sycophant, he and @jasonfried are my literal heroes. The first book I read when I decided I wanted to be a Founder was Rework. In the podcast, DHH made a point about how the HARDEST THING in 2026 as a software founder is to NOT BUILD EVERYTHING, because it’s so easy to build. He said there is something so beautiful about physical products where you finish it, bring it to market, and that’s what it is, on the shelf, forever… And since software isn’t that way, apps often become a bloated mess of noise. So I put it to you … What if RB2B’s revenue doesn’t grow anymore, EVER? What if the website and product are EXACT same 10 yrs from now? What if I launch a brand every 2-3 years that does the exact same thing? WHY DOESN’T ANYBODY ELSE THINK THAT WOULD BE AWESOME?!?!?! Because I do. And I’m going to keep doing it.

122K
48
9
2
4w ago
RetentionAdam
RB2B is a $10m ARR company with 1 FTE. I'd be OK if it never grew another dollar. Why? Because what makes it work are the constraints. We designed a stupid-simple PLG product that could be supported entirely by @fin_ai. The McDonald’s of site visitor ID. I know most founders don't agree with this approach... I can’t tell you the number of times - since BEFORE LAUNCH - people told us we needed to use AI to filter for ICP, find more contacts, draft messaging, and send emails and LinkedIn messages. And it’s what all of our competitors did (who are now all DEAD). While we kept the core product in its simplest possible form. In fact, it’s STILL HAPPENING. Last week on the way home from our all team offsite in Toronto my buddy @jesseogtm was yelling at me about how I needed to roll MoltSets into RB2B because it would solve our churn problem and double revenue. But here’s my question to founders: WHY DO WE NEED TO SOLVE OUR CHURN PROBLEM AND DOUBLE REVENUE? If you include our OEM $$$, RB2B is over $10m ARR. And it requires ALMOST NOTHING from us, while our core team goes on to build something we think has similar characteristics but is even MORE promising. Yes, we have a shared data team of 5 people who support four business units that total $32m ARR. Yes, Ebru does answer escalated tickets, and continues to improve Fin. Yes, Kayley handles OEM. But I am completely baffled that human nature makes it impossible for ANYBODY - even Jesse, a close homie and fellow bootstrapper - to accept that RB2B might just orbit at $10m ARR for the next 5-10 years, its product in its simplest possible form, supported by a SEARINGLY CLEAR value proposition, at a price so low that nobody can disrupt its market position. I listened to @dhh on @davidsenra's podcast on the way to the offsite. Of course I’m a sycophant, he and @jasonfried are my literal heroes. The first book I read when I decided I wanted to be a Founder was Rework. In the podcast, DHH made a point about how the HARDEST THING in 2026 as a software founder is to NOT BUILD EVERYTHING, because it’s so easy to build. He said there is something so beautiful about physical products where you finish it, bring it to market, and that’s what it is, on the shelf, forever… And since software isn’t that way, apps often become a bloated mess of noise. So I put it to you … What if RB2B’s revenue doesn’t grow anymore, EVER? What if the website and product are EXACT same 10 yrs from now? What if I launch a brand every 2-3 years that does the exact same thing? WHY DOESN’T ANYBODY ELSE THINK THAT WOULD BE AWESOME?!?!?! Because I do. And I’m going to keep doing it.

To be clear, I will not sign an NDA or redline ANYTHING whatsoever for our $79/mo PLG Web-ID product. Stop asking me over and over again to perform legal work so that your enterprise company can “run a test”. I know it’s impossible for you to believe that I don’t care about your business. But I don’t. RB2B is PLG, we serve the SMB, and we’re proud of it. And by the way - I think saying “no” to all things Enterprise is one of the things that makes RB2B so awesome. You can’t talk to someone even if you wanted to, and that’s BY DESIGN. We get away with it by having a product that is so simple and inexpensive that you don’t need to talk to people. If you need an NDA to use a $79/mo widget, were not the right fit. And thats okay. If you want to buy data, on the other hand … hit me up and our team GOT U!!! DM me. Our data is sick, particularly B2B2C.

118K
58
15
11
1mo ago
RetentionAdam
To be clear, I will not sign an NDA or redline ANYTHING whatsoever for our $79/mo PLG Web-ID product. Stop asking me over and over again to perform legal work so that your enterprise company can “run a test”. I know it’s impossible for you to believe that I don’t care about your business. But I don’t. RB2B is PLG, we serve the SMB, and we’re proud of it. And by the way - I think saying “no” to all things Enterprise is one of the things that makes RB2B so awesome. You can’t talk to someone even if you wanted to, and that’s BY DESIGN. We get away with it by having a product that is so simple and inexpensive that you don’t need to talk to people. If you need an NDA to use a $79/mo widget, were not the right fit. And thats okay. If you want to buy data, on the other hand … hit me up and our team GOT U!!! DM me. Our data is sick, particularly B2B2C.
Startup founder configuring his 50 AI agents, building his SOPs, and monitoring his vibe coded analytics dashboard with 300 different metrics. (He has 0 paying customers)
106K
59
10
7
1mo ago
RetentionAdam
Startup founder configuring his 50 AI agents, building his SOPs, and monitoring his vibe coded analytics dashboard with 300 different metrics. (He has 0 paying customers)
ARR vs. amount of VC money raised
101K
34
3
1
1mo ago
RetentionAdam
ARR vs. amount of VC money raised

Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) X Stats & Analytics

Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) has 20.2K X followers with a 0.22% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 369 posts, Adam Robinson received 39.5K total likes and 20.4M impressions, averaging 107 likes per post. This page tracks Adam Robinson's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily. To benchmark @retentionadam against other accounts, use Socialpruf's X competitor analysis tool.

Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does Adam Robinson have?+
Adam Robinson (@retentionadam) has 20.2K X (Twitter) followers as of November 2026.
What is Adam Robinson's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
Adam Robinson's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 0.22% over the last 12 months, based on 369 posts.
How many likes does Adam Robinson get on X (Twitter)?+
Adam Robinson received 39.5K total likes across 369 posts in the last 12 months, averaging 107 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does Adam Robinson get?+
Adam Robinson's X (Twitter) content generated 20.4M total impressions over the last 12 months.
Can I compare Adam Robinson with other X accounts?+
Yes. Add @retentionadam to a competitor set with Socialpruf's X competitor analysis tool and benchmark it side by side with any other public accounts on views, engagement rate and follower growth, with history back to each account's first post.