NewClaim a free social report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
109K
impressions
21.0M
likes
589K
comments
129K
posts
2.94K
engagement
3.42%
emv
$729K
Average per post
7.16K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

1.03M
3.10K
146
411
4mo ago
danmartell
Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

722K
10.0K
209
905
6mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

275K
16.3K
270
3.00K
7mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

244K
1.91K
128
131
8mo ago
danmartell
Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

Broke people are addicted to information, rich people are addicted to execution.

213K
10.4K
230
1.23K
1mo ago
danmartell
Broke people are addicted to information, rich people are addicted to execution.

Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

186K
1.55K
101
155
8mo ago
danmartell
Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

171K
4.92K
315
642
4mo ago
danmartell
The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

147K
11.5K
195
1.81K
4mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

123K
11.2K
170
1.04K
4mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

120K
3.76K
243
380
10mo ago
danmartell
The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

84.0K
2.64K
194
218
7mo ago
danmartell
the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

81.9K
3.10K
144
400
4mo ago
danmartell
Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

Life will test you before it blesses you.

80.5K
1.85K
158
305
3mo ago
danmartell
Life will test you before it blesses you.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

76.5K
5.39K
134
449
7mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

76.5K
579
75
87
2mo ago
danmartell
I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

Never underestimate a person who practices self education in their free time.

73.4K
4.31K
207
807
4mo ago
danmartell
Never underestimate a person who practices self education in their free time.

Discipline looks boring until you see the life it builds.

62.0K
839
142
162
3mo ago
danmartell
Discipline looks boring until you see the life it builds.

In less than 2 years, the AI market will be over $1Trillion. If you want to get rich, go all in on AI.

60.2K
879
141
66
6mo ago
danmartell
In less than 2 years, the AI market will be over $1Trillion. If you want to get rich, go all in on AI.

I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

53.1K
1.74K
194
334
4mo ago
danmartell
I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

The hardest part of personal development is realizing you were the problem the whole time.

48.8K
935
130
146
6mo ago
danmartell
The hardest part of personal development is realizing you were the problem the whole time.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Stats & Analytics

Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 109K X followers with a 3.42% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 2.94K posts, Dan Martell received 589K total likes and 21.0M impressions, averaging 201 likes per post. This page tracks Dan Martell's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does Dan Martell have?+
Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 109K X (Twitter) followers as of August 2026.
What is Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 3.42% over the last 12 months, based on 2.94K posts.
How many likes does Dan Martell get on X (Twitter)?+
Dan Martell received 589K total likes across 2.94K posts in the last 12 months, averaging 201 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does Dan Martell get?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) content generated 21.0M total impressions over the last 12 months.