NewGet @danmartell's full report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
111K
impressions
17.8M
likes
570K
comments
109K
posts
2.39K
engagement
3.81%
emv
$635K
Average per post
7.46K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

1.03M
3.09K
145
409
6mo ago
danmartell
Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

722K
9.93K
207
892
8mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

275K
16.1K
269
2.97K
9mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

manifesting $1B

248K
5.74K
230
2.18K
5d ago
danmartell
manifesting $1B

Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

245K
1.88K
127
128
10mo ago
danmartell
Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

Broke people are addicted to information, rich people are addicted to execution.

215K
10.3K
225
1.20K
3mo ago
danmartell
Broke people are addicted to information, rich people are addicted to execution.

You're smart.. but imagine if you were consistent.

192K
17.5K
136
3.00K
3w ago
danmartell
You're smart.. but imagine if you were consistent.

Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

186K
1.53K
101
153
10mo ago
danmartell
Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

172K
4.88K
313
638
6mo ago
danmartell
The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

147K
11.4K
191
1.79K
6mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

124K
11.0K
165
1.02K
6mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

84.0K
2.61K
192
217
9mo ago
danmartell
the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

82.0K
3.07K
144
393
6mo ago
danmartell
Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

Life will test you before it blesses you.

80.6K
1.83K
157
302
5mo ago
danmartell
Life will test you before it blesses you.

To be an overachiever, you have to be an over-believer.

79.5K
1.19K
60
144
1w ago
danmartell
To be an overachiever, you have to be an over-believer.

I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

76.7K
575
74
87
4mo ago
danmartell
I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

76.5K
5.36K
132
444
9mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

Never underestimate a person who practices self education in their free time.

73.5K
4.26K
205
799
6mo ago
danmartell
Never underestimate a person who practices self education in their free time.

Stay around ambitious people. They'll never mock you for trying.

65.9K
2.88K
116
398
4d ago
danmartell
Stay around ambitious people. They'll never mock you for trying.

Discipline looks boring until you see the life it builds.

62.3K
834
137
159
5mo ago
danmartell
Discipline looks boring until you see the life it builds.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Stats & Analytics

Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 111K X followers with a 3.81% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 2.39K posts, Dan Martell received 570K total likes and 17.8M impressions, averaging 239 likes per post. This page tracks Dan Martell's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does Dan Martell have?+
Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 111K X (Twitter) followers as of October 2026.
What is Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 3.81% over the last 12 months, based on 2.39K posts.
How many likes does Dan Martell get on X (Twitter)?+
Dan Martell received 570K total likes across 2.39K posts in the last 12 months, averaging 239 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does Dan Martell get?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) content generated 17.8M total impressions over the last 12 months.