NewGet @danmartell's full report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
114K
impressions
17.4M
likes
594K
comments
98.0K
posts
1.91K
engagement
3.97%
emv
$619K
Average per post
9.13K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

1.03M
3.08K
143
405
7mo ago
danmartell
Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

722K
9.85K
204
889
9mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

manifesting $1B

276K
5.70K
229
2.17K
1mo ago
danmartell
manifesting $1B

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

275K
16.0K
267
2.95K
10mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

The poor are addicted to entertainment. The ambitious are addicted to information. The rich are addicted to execution.

251K
12.8K
236
2.00K
4d ago
danmartell
The poor are addicted to entertainment. The ambitious are addicted to information. The rich are addicted to execution.

Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

245K
1.87K
125
128
11mo ago
danmartell
Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

Broke people are addicted to information, rich people are addicted to execution.

216K
10.2K
223
1.19K
4mo ago
danmartell
Broke people are addicted to information, rich people are addicted to execution.

You're smart.. but imagine if you were consistent.

194K
17.3K
132
2.98K
2mo ago
danmartell
You're smart.. but imagine if you were consistent.

Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

186K
1.52K
101
153
11mo ago
danmartell
Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

172K
4.85K
309
634
7mo ago
danmartell
The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

147K
11.3K
190
1.78K
8mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

Major cheat code for life: get addicted to execution, not information.

142K
7.87K
170
1.03K
2w ago
danmartell
Major cheat code for life: get addicted to execution, not information.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

124K
11.0K
162
1.01K
8mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

Major cheat code: walking around like life is rigged in your favor actually rigs it in your favor

96.9K
8.66K
100
621
4w ago
danmartell
Major cheat code: walking around like life is rigged in your favor actually rigs it in your favor

the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

84.1K
2.60K
190
216
10mo ago
danmartell
the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

82.0K
3.05K
144
389
7mo ago
danmartell
Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

Life will test you before it blesses you.

80.7K
1.82K
157
300
7mo ago
danmartell
Life will test you before it blesses you.

To be an overachiever, you have to be an over-believer.

80.4K
1.18K
60
143
1mo ago
danmartell
To be an overachiever, you have to be an over-believer.

Side effect of building your own thing: you become completely unemployable.

79.3K
2.28K
171
162
2w ago
danmartell
Side effect of building your own thing: you become completely unemployable.

Your entire life changes when you realize that getting rich is a skill issue.

77.4K
3.32K
105
287
1mo ago
danmartell
Your entire life changes when you realize that getting rich is a skill issue.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Stats & Analytics

Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 114K X followers with a 3.97% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 1.91K posts, Dan Martell received 594K total likes and 17.4M impressions, averaging 311 likes per post. This page tracks Dan Martell's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily. To benchmark @danmartell against other accounts, use Socialpruf's X competitor analysis tool.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does Dan Martell have?+
Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 114K X (Twitter) followers as of November 2026.
What is Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 3.97% over the last 12 months, based on 1.91K posts.
How many likes does Dan Martell get on X (Twitter)?+
Dan Martell received 594K total likes across 1.91K posts in the last 12 months, averaging 311 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does Dan Martell get?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) content generated 17.4M total impressions over the last 12 months.
Can I compare Dan Martell with other X accounts?+
Yes. Add @danmartell to a competitor set with Socialpruf's X competitor analysis tool and benchmark it side by side with any other public accounts on views, engagement rate and follower growth, with history back to each account's first post.