NewClaim a free social report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
106K
impressions
25.2M
likes
644K
comments
145K
posts
3.35K
engagement
3.13%
emv
$847K
Average per post
7.53K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

1.03M
3.12K
148
412
1mo ago
danmartell
Jack Dorsey just published something that should be required reading for every founder. The premise: the org chart needs to be replaced entirely. And the argument starts 2,000 years ago. For thousands of years, every organization on earth has run on the same logic the Roman Army invented. Small teams report to a leader → Leaders report to managers → Managers report to executives. The whole structure exists for one reason: to route information up and down the chain. That's it. The whole system exists to solve a bandwidth problem. Jack's argument is simple: AI solves it better. Block built what they call a "world model" - a continuously updated picture of everything happening across the company. Every decision. Every customer. Every transaction. Every bottleneck. In real time. No status update needed. No weekly sync. No manager to translate what's happening on the ground into language the executive can understand. When the world model carries the information, you don't need the layers. So they eliminated them. Block now runs on three roles: Individual contributors who build. DRIs who own specific outcomes for a fixed period. Player-coaches who develop people while still doing the work themselves. No middle layer. The system handles coordination. The humans handle the work. I've coached thousands of founders. The number one problem is always the same: information latency. By the time a problem surfaces from your front line to leadership, it's already compounded. By the time a decision travels back down, the damage is done. That lag costs you deals, people, and momentum. And most founders accept it as the price of scale. Block is trying to prove you don't have to anymore. I think they're right. Because the hierarchy was never the point - it was just the best tool we had. The moment something better exists, the layers eventually collapse. This is either the biggest structural shift since the 1850s - or it breaks at scale like everything else before it. Either way - every founder should be asking the same question: how much of your org exists just to route information? If the answer is "most of it" - that's your problem. And your opportunity. -DM

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

722K
10.2K
212
923
3mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

274K
16.5K
276
3.04K
4mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

244K
1.94K
128
136
5mo ago
danmartell
Nobody gets great by constantly switching directions. Commit. Obsess. Go all in.

Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

185K
1.58K
101
156
5mo ago
danmartell
Stay f*cking delusional. Lock in so hard that other people think you’ve lost it. Remember, it’s only delusional until it works.

The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

171K
4.99K
320
655
1mo ago
danmartell
The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

146K
11.6K
205
1.84K
1mo ago
danmartell
You’re smart… but imagine if you were consistent.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

123K
11.4K
174
1.07K
2mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.

120K
3.82K
247
386
7mo ago
danmartell
The more you build your own thing, the more unemployable you become.
88.2K
603
6
91
10mo ago
danmartell

the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

83.8K
2.67K
200
224
4mo ago
danmartell
the more you build your own thing… the more unemployable you become.

Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

81.7K
3.14K
145
410
1mo ago
danmartell
Quitting a job is OK. Moving on is OK. Struggling is OK. What's NOT okay is staying somewhere you're not valued and appreciated.

Life will test you before it blesses you.

80.2K
1.88K
163
309
1mo ago
danmartell
Life will test you before it blesses you.

The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

76.4K
5.48K
139
460
4mo ago
danmartell
The world is run by: - C- students - Fired employees - People no smarter than you Don’t underestimate yourself.

Never underestimate a person who practices self education in their free time.

72.8K
4.36K
213
820
1mo ago
danmartell
Never underestimate a person who practices self education in their free time.

Freedom isn’t having an empty calendar, it’s having a full one of things you love to do.

67.2K
510
60
128
10mo ago
danmartell
Freedom isn’t having an empty calendar, it’s having a full one of things you love to do.
63.4K
1.11K
14
158
11mo ago
danmartell

In less than 2 years, the AI market will be over $1Trillion. If you want to get rich, go all in on AI.

60.2K
892
143
69
3mo ago
danmartell
In less than 2 years, the AI market will be over $1Trillion. If you want to get rich, go all in on AI.

Be teachable. You’re not always right.

54.8K
615
88
136
11mo ago
danmartell
Be teachable. You’re not always right.

I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

52.9K
1.76K
196
342
2mo ago
danmartell
I want to be around people who think $1B is too little.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Stats & Analytics

Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 106K X followers with a 3.13% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 3.35K posts, Dan Martell received 644K total likes and 25.2M impressions, averaging 192 likes per post. This page tracks Dan Martell's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily.

Dan Martell (@danmartell) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does Dan Martell have?+
Dan Martell (@danmartell) has 106K X (Twitter) followers as of May 2026.
What is Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 3.13% over the last 12 months, based on 3.35K posts.
How many likes does Dan Martell get on X (Twitter)?+
Dan Martell received 644K total likes across 3.35K posts in the last 12 months, averaging 192 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does Dan Martell get?+
Dan Martell's X (Twitter) content generated 25.2M total impressions over the last 12 months.