Startup CEOs can’t even hug their chief people officer at a concert in this country anymore

Here is most of what I’ve gathered on the Windsurf / Google Deal The founders and dozens of engineers are going to Google. This group, along with the preferred shareholders will be sharing the $2.4B headline number. The exact split is unknown but investors are making some money on the deal and the founders plus this select group are making a ton. That brings us to the hundreds of employees that aren’t going to Google. From what I’ve heard they are all getting screwed regardless of their vesting status. Their consolation prize is that they now own 100% of the original company. Windsurf’s leadership is making the argument that this is a win for those that aren’t joining Google. Their claim is that Windsurf still has a meaningful amount of revenue and a solid balance sheet. But Windsurf will now be facing intense competition from not only its former founders and engineers who are now at Google, but every other company in code gen that they were already completing with / losing to (Cursor, Anthropic, etc). Given that Google now has a license to the core technology, it is safe to assume that the Windsurf will struggle and on a longer time horizon will be a zero. This structure appears to be very similar to Google’s deal with CharacterAI. Google effectively acquired Noam Shazeer and left CharacterAI employee owned. The difference there is that Google had no desire to compete in AI companionship, they just wanted Noam and some key people. Windsurf is a left in a much worse position. My read is that the Windsurf leadership team was desperate to find a way out and facing competition from the labs and Cursor structured a deal to benefit themselves. Why they thought they could structure a deal like this and get away with it is anyones guess. At this point, I imagine all the parties involved are scrambling to try to find a resolution because if things stay as they are, it will be a massive stain on the industry. We will probably see some more facts come out in the next 24 hours. I hope that Windsurf’s founders work quickly with all parties to properly take care of their team.

Rage Baiting is for Losers Yesterday, YC announced Chad IDE aka “the brainrot code editor.” Chad is an AI code editor that allows you to gamble, watch TikTok, and use dating apps while working on coding tasks. Their launch rightfully got a lot of attention. On one hand it’s funny. On the other hand, what are we doing here and why does this belong on the official YC account? To understand Chad IDE, Cluely, Icon, Friend, and the new class of Gen Z startups, you have to understand the online environment these founders grew up in. If you grew up on the internet and studied how and why certain people would regularly go viral, you know that making people mad has and always will be a highly effective way to get attention. The feedback loop is simple: 1) make something (product or ad) that makes people angry; 2) people comment/ share/ dunk; 3) because feeds are optimized to show posts with high engagement the most, you get more reach. Rage baiting for commercial purposes was pioneered by course bros. People like Tai Lopez realized that making the masses mad was an effective way to drive course sales. They could flaunt Lamborghinis, make a bunch of people angry, and as long as a handful of people found their way into their course, it was a viable, repeatable strategy. Historically on X, rage baiting was a marketing strategy, not a product strategy. Accounts like @sweatystartup frequently post things to get an angry reaction and subsequent reach, but behind the scenes he's always been running a normal commercial real estate fund. In 2025, rage baiting has become a product strategy. Cluely started as an app for cheating on coding interviews. Chad IDE’s only known differentiation from the other hundred AI native IDEs is that you can gamble and swipe on dating apps in it. The rage bait is sitting at the product level now. It’s becoming clear that while rage bait might occasionally work as a marketing strategy, it really should not be employed as a product strategy. Running a successful VC-backed company requires you to build a coalition of people that want to see you win. Getting media, investors, talent, and customers on your side is not an easy task. Rage baiting (whether at the marketing level or product level) is the most effective way to get people (who could be potential investors, customers, or team members) to actively pray for your downfall. YC has long provided some of the most durable, high quality, generalizable advice for startups and I believe it has had a tremendously positive impact on the companies that go through YC and even those that don’t. Launch now, make something people want, do things that don’t scale, ignore your competitors, etc. As someone who believes that YC is one of the most important and influential institutions in tech, I believe it might be time to include this in their list of essential startup advice: “Rage baiting is for losers.”

I hired Dylan in 2021 at Party Round and he was my right hand through the joy & chaos of ZIRP, SVB, and beyond Since then he built & sold a media company to @Uniswap 4 years later, I'm thrilled to be joining forces again, 100% focused on our favorite business: show business

If your CEO has a "work computer" and a "personal computer" it's time to start polishing your resume

I'm updating my timelines. You now have have at least 4 years to escape the permanent underclass

Low IQ high agency continues to be one of the most OP human builds

I'm sick of food products with long lists of ingredients that I don't understand. Someone should make a protein bar with just the following: -whey protein (50g) -caffeine (300mg) -nicotine (6mg) -testosterone (200mg) -adderral (20mg IR)

Spoke too soon

Someone should make software that allows you to easily play all these songs on your phone, make playlists, and share music with friends I bet a lot of people would happily pay $10/month Could even give artists a rev share

Lawyer friend: “I’ve seen the future. Harvey isn’t perfect but has better attention to detail and is more thoughtful than almost any junior person at our firm. I’ve watched it do $100K of associate level work in 10 minutes”