NewClaim a free social report
X analytics
Similar Accounts:
followers
41.2K
impressions
7.37M
likes
35.4K
comments
3.75K
posts
2.07K
engagement
0.531%
emv
$161K
Average per post
3.56K

Key Metrics

Distributions

Top Content

t.co/SaUvnPnbuV

405K
555
17
85
5d ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/SaUvnPnbuV

t.co/LGxhaM4TDn

373K
871
22
85
2mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/LGxhaM4TDn

t.co/ySUpmxpwFo

358K
1.06K
26
157
2mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/ySUpmxpwFo

Karpathy's autoresearch isn't just for AI research. You can use it for business. Imagine running 700x more experiments: - Landing pages - Creatives - AEO/SEO - Pricing - E-mails - Cold outreach - Warm outreach - AP/AR - Procurement Revenues: 📈

306K
1.60K
43
141
2mo ago
ericosiu
Karpathy's autoresearch isn't just for AI research. You can use it for business. Imagine running 700x more experiments: - Landing pages - Creatives - AEO/SEO - Pricing - E-mails - Cold outreach - Warm outreach - AP/AR - Procurement Revenues: 📈
Every company is missing the same layer:

A company brain.

Right now, the memory of the business is scattered across calls, docs, Slack threads, dashboards, SOPs, and people's heads.

That's the part people miss when they talk about a company brain.

The value isn't a giant folder of company knowledge. Every company already has that.

The real advantage is the intelligence layer that sits between all that context and the work your team needs done.

This is the layer every AI-native company will need:
294K
1.54K
70
228
5d ago
ericosiu
Every company is missing the same layer: A company brain. Right now, the memory of the business is scattered across calls, docs, Slack threads, dashboards, SOPs, and people's heads. That's the part people miss when they talk about a company brain. The value isn't a giant folder of company knowledge. Every company already has that. The real advantage is the intelligence layer that sits between all that context and the work your team needs done. This is the layer every AI-native company will need:

Every org needs a world intelligence to operate at a 10x level. It might seem daunting, but it’s worth the investment. We’re already starting to see a multiplier at my company. Here’s how to get started:

157K
399
16
29
1mo ago
ericosiu
Every org needs a world intelligence to operate at a 10x level. It might seem daunting, but it’s worth the investment. We’re already starting to see a multiplier at my company. Here’s how to get started:

The founder who 'hired a CEO and stepped back' just shut down. Here's the email he sent me. "Eric, you were right. I thought I could hire my way to freedom. 3 years and $10M in burn later, we're done." His mistake? The same one I've made. Multiple times. He believed the fairy tale that you can bring in a CEO and disappear. That somehow a hired gun will care as much as you do about your baby. Here's what actually happened: - The CEO made 'strategic pivots' that gutted their core product. - Revenue dropped 40% in 18 months. - Their best engineers left because "the culture changed." - Customer churn hit 35% when they stopped innovating. The founder watched from the sidelines, thinking he was being smart by "not micromanaging." Truth is, no hired CEO will ever match a founder's obsession. They're playing with house money while you built the house. I've tried this move 4 times. Each time ended the same way - me jumping back in to save what was left. The successful founders I know? They stay involved. They might hire CEOs, but they're still in the trenches on what matters. There's a reason Zuckerberg, Huang, and Musk haven't "stepped back." Your company needs you more than you think. What's your take - can founders ever truly step away?

148K
331
53
34
7mo ago
ericosiu
The founder who 'hired a CEO and stepped back' just shut down. Here's the email he sent me. "Eric, you were right. I thought I could hire my way to freedom. 3 years and $10M in burn later, we're done." His mistake? The same one I've made. Multiple times. He believed the fairy tale that you can bring in a CEO and disappear. That somehow a hired gun will care as much as you do about your baby. Here's what actually happened: - The CEO made 'strategic pivots' that gutted their core product. - Revenue dropped 40% in 18 months. - Their best engineers left because "the culture changed." - Customer churn hit 35% when they stopped innovating. The founder watched from the sidelines, thinking he was being smart by "not micromanaging." Truth is, no hired CEO will ever match a founder's obsession. They're playing with house money while you built the house. I've tried this move 4 times. Each time ended the same way - me jumping back in to save what was left. The successful founders I know? They stay involved. They might hire CEOs, but they're still in the trenches on what matters. There's a reason Zuckerberg, Huang, and Musk haven't "stepped back." Your company needs you more than you think. What's your take - can founders ever truly step away?

t.co/feOhkEBLqi

130K
548
25
48
3mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/feOhkEBLqi

TBPN is a 7k-live-viewer pod that sold to OpenAI for $200M because their average clip gets 257k views. Everyone's talking about the strategy. Here's the structure: 1. Format is engineered for clippability, not the other way around 3 hours/day, live, 5 days a week — massive raw inventory to mine Guest call-ins (6–8 per show) = built-in 5–10 min self-contained segments. Every guest segment is a pre-packaged clip candidate with a hook, arc, and payoff Hosts read tweets live on air → instant meme fodder + the tweet author shares the clip back (distribution loop) "High and low" aesthetic: mahogany desk + cinematic lighting + suits, BUT content is group-chat casual. Makes clips feel premium + authentic at the same time 2. The clip itself - consistent visual grammar Aspect ratio mix: native horizontal on X (where they're platform-native), 9:16 re-cut for TikTok/Shorts/Reels Opening 3 seconds: hard cut to the punchline or hot take. No intro, no ramp Captions: burned-in, large, two-color (speaker name + quote), word-level highlight Lower-third branding: TBPN bug + topic tag always visible → instant brand recognition even if muted Length: 30-90 seconds sweet spot. Guest clips run longer (2-3 min) when the take is meaty End frame: guest's handle + "@TBPN" — clip becomes an ad for itself 3. The caption/tweet wrapper Format: "[quote]" - @[guest] — always attribution-forward Second line: context (what show, what topic) — usually one sentence Never an explainer or thread. The clip does the work. Posted from @tbpn main account AND the guest usually quote-RTs → dual distribution 4. Volume + cadence ~8-15 clips per episode posted across the day (not dumped at once) Each clip tests a different hook/angle from same episode "Most popular clips of the last 2 weeks" recap posts = second-wave distribution on the winners Weekend: compilation content, "best of" threads 5. The real edge The clips aren't actually why TBPN wins - they're a symptom. The real skill is "timeline control": reading when a topic is peaking, coining phrases that spread, getting the right guest on the day a story breaks. Clips are the delivery vehicle for a bigger game of being the center-of-gravity account for tech Twitter. It seems like a no-brainer to at least try to figure out how to adapt this if you create content.

129K
360
14
32
1mo ago
ericosiu
TBPN is a 7k-live-viewer pod that sold to OpenAI for $200M because their average clip gets 257k views. Everyone's talking about the strategy. Here's the structure: 1. Format is engineered for clippability, not the other way around 3 hours/day, live, 5 days a week — massive raw inventory to mine Guest call-ins (6–8 per show) = built-in 5–10 min self-contained segments. Every guest segment is a pre-packaged clip candidate with a hook, arc, and payoff Hosts read tweets live on air → instant meme fodder + the tweet author shares the clip back (distribution loop) "High and low" aesthetic: mahogany desk + cinematic lighting + suits, BUT content is group-chat casual. Makes clips feel premium + authentic at the same time 2. The clip itself - consistent visual grammar Aspect ratio mix: native horizontal on X (where they're platform-native), 9:16 re-cut for TikTok/Shorts/Reels Opening 3 seconds: hard cut to the punchline or hot take. No intro, no ramp Captions: burned-in, large, two-color (speaker name + quote), word-level highlight Lower-third branding: TBPN bug + topic tag always visible → instant brand recognition even if muted Length: 30-90 seconds sweet spot. Guest clips run longer (2-3 min) when the take is meaty End frame: guest's handle + "@TBPN" — clip becomes an ad for itself 3. The caption/tweet wrapper Format: "[quote]" - @[guest] — always attribution-forward Second line: context (what show, what topic) — usually one sentence Never an explainer or thread. The clip does the work. Posted from @tbpn main account AND the guest usually quote-RTs → dual distribution 4. Volume + cadence ~8-15 clips per episode posted across the day (not dumped at once) Each clip tests a different hook/angle from same episode "Most popular clips of the last 2 weeks" recap posts = second-wave distribution on the winners Weekend: compilation content, "best of" threads 5. The real edge The clips aren't actually why TBPN wins - they're a symptom. The real skill is "timeline control": reading when a topic is peaking, coining phrases that spread, getting the right guest on the day a story breaks. Clips are the delivery vehicle for a bigger game of being the center-of-gravity account for tech Twitter. It seems like a no-brainer to at least try to figure out how to adapt this if you create content.
My bet is everyone is going to have something River-like at their company. 

We have been doing this for the last 2 months at my company - we call it 'Single Brain'.  

Since we're a marketing services company, we have it focus on that. The speed multiplier it adds is insane. 

Just think about it: ads, SEO, creative, analytics, etc. are all at your fingertips. The moment the individual sees it, they can't ever go back to the old way of working.

Watching everyone's brains accelerate has been a joy.
124K
359
21
14
3w ago
ericosiu
My bet is everyone is going to have something River-like at their company. We have been doing this for the last 2 months at my company - we call it 'Single Brain'. Since we're a marketing services company, we have it focus on that. The speed multiplier it adds is insane. Just think about it: ads, SEO, creative, analytics, etc. are all at your fingertips. The moment the individual sees it, they can't ever go back to the old way of working. Watching everyone's brains accelerate has been a joy.

t.co/H6eQJdAVIu

123K
108
3
23
1mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/H6eQJdAVIu

We are hiring forward deployed engineers from around the world. The talent we’ve been talking to coming from X has been incredible. Many engineers that go through our ‘beat AI’ challenge (in my profile) have been remarkable. If that’s you, take the challenge. 😉

116K
630
33
39
3w ago
ericosiu
We are hiring forward deployed engineers from around the world. The talent we’ve been talking to coming from X has been incredible. Many engineers that go through our ‘beat AI’ challenge (in my profile) have been remarkable. If that’s you, take the challenge. 😉

t.co/p3aLVdC9dC

112K
288
5
31
1mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/p3aLVdC9dC
This is the new AI forward agency org chart.

The old model was functions, handoffs, reports, and labor arbitrage.

The new model is outcomes, loops, agent fleets, and systems memory.

Every role owns a number. Every loop has feedback. Every workflow writes back to the company brain.

This is how we're thinking about it:
107K
684
40
96
1w ago
ericosiu
This is the new AI forward agency org chart. The old model was functions, handoffs, reports, and labor arbitrage. The new model is outcomes, loops, agent fleets, and systems memory. Every role owns a number. Every loop has feedback. Every workflow writes back to the company brain. This is how we're thinking about it:

t.co/YfSuTchDgh

107K
937
38
100
3mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/YfSuTchDgh

t.co/Cbl7y6YtNA

104K
250
4
28
4w ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/Cbl7y6YtNA

t.co/IGhe1Ll9AK

96.6K
304
6
22
2mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/IGhe1Ll9AK

@PolymarketMoney The man @geoffreywoo spearheaded many of these

91.4K
31
1
0
5mo ago
ericosiu
@PolymarketMoney The man @geoffreywoo spearheaded many of these

t.co/8ZT2rrhihr

90.5K
805
29
75
3mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/8ZT2rrhihr

t.co/08yn9cNYdO

87.7K
965
25
94
3mo ago
ericosiu
https://t.co/08yn9cNYdO

ericosiu (@ericosiu) X Stats & Analytics

ericosiu (@ericosiu) has 41.2K X followers with a 0.53% engagement rate over the past 12 months. Across 2.07K posts, ericosiu received 35.4K total likes and 7.37M impressions, averaging 17.1 likes per post. This page tracks ericosiu's performance metrics, top content, and engagement trends — updated daily.

ericosiu (@ericosiu) X Analytics FAQ

How many X (Twitter) followers does ericosiu have?+
ericosiu (@ericosiu) has 41.2K X (Twitter) followers as of June 2026.
What is ericosiu's X (Twitter) engagement rate?+
ericosiu's X (Twitter) engagement rate is 0.53% over the last 12 months, based on 2.07K posts.
How many likes does ericosiu get on X (Twitter)?+
ericosiu received 35.4K total likes across 2.07K posts in the last 12 months, averaging 17.1 likes per post.
How many X (Twitter) impressions does ericosiu get?+
ericosiu's X (Twitter) content generated 7.37M total impressions over the last 12 months.